Newsom says state has $27 billion budget shortfall, but it can be balanced without raising taxes
California’s state budget has a $27.6 billion deficit, though it can be balanced without new taxes or major cuts to core programs, Gov. Gavin Newsom said Friday.
Unveiling his revised $288 billion May state budget for 2024-25, Newsom laid out a plan that relies on taking some money from “rainy day” reserves set aside in prior years, while also delaying some state programs. It leaves 10,000 state jobs unfilled and reduces spending on other programs — from new water storage to middle-class scholarship programs to housing assistance for low-income people.
“We have to be responsible. We have to be accountable. We have to balance the budget,” Newsom said.
In January, Newsom announced that the state had a $38 billion state deficit. The state Legislative Analyst’s Office said in February it could be as high as $73 billion, a number the governor rejected. Newsom said Friday the total turned out to be $44.9 billion. By March, the governor and state lawmakers reached a deal to reduce it by $17.3 billion, leaving a $27.6 billion deficit now.
Under state law, the Legislature is required to pass a budget by June 15 or lawmakers won’t get paid. After that, Newsom has until July 1 to agree with them on a final spending plan.
Republicans, in the minority in both the Assembly and Senate in Sacramento, criticized the proposal and generally called for more spending cuts.
“California’s budget situation is a mess,” said Assemblyman Vince Fong, R-Bakersfield, the vice chairman of the Assembly Budget Committee. “I have said repeatedly that budget gimmicks, cost shifts and more borrowing only creates more problems in the future. Using budget reserves to prop up unsustainable spending is not only unwise, it’s fiscally irresponsible.”
California’s budget went from a surplus three years ago to deficits over the past two years. Capital gains taxes surged in 2021 due to a booming stock market but plummeted in 2022 following a market downturn, which reduced the amount of capital gains taxes that the wealthiest Californians pay. Also, state budget analysts had difficulty accurately predicting how much tax money would be coming in after the IRS allowed Californians last year to delay paying taxes from April until November due to the historic storms that upended many communities.
“It’s boom or bust,” said Sanjay Varshney, a professor of finance at Sacramento State University. “The top 1% of earners account for almost half the budget. So what happens to the 1% has a major impact on the state budget.”
California’s government, and many state residents, also received billions in emergency funding from the federal government during the COVID pandemic, which now has run out.
Newsom echoed that concern. He said the state should begin budgeting in two-year cycles. On Friday he also laid out a plan for 2025-26, although that will be subject to change next year.
For this year, the governor proposed closing the budget deficit with:
• $15.2 billion in cuts: Those include cutting $500 million from water-storage programs, $2 billion in broadband funding, $510 million in middle-class scholarship programs, and $550 million in preschool and kindergarten programs.• $14.8 billion in pauses and shifts: Among them is moving $4 billion in spending for electric vehicle and renewable energy programs out of the general fund to be covered by the state’s cap and trade funds, which are fees paid by polluting industries. Another $1.4 billion in childcare programs would be delayed; and $972 million in childcare programs would shift from the general fund to be paid for by cannabis funds.• $7.5 billion in revenues and borrowing, which includes some budget tricks, such as saving $1.6 billion by delaying from June 30 until July 1 the date that state workers are paid, which moves the expense into a new fiscal year.• $4.2 billion from rainy day reserves.• $3 billion in efficiencies: These including leaving 10,000 state jobs open and cutting 8% from state department office budgets by reducing landlines and printing costs.
Not proposed for cuts were some of the main new programs that Newsom and Democrats in the Legislature have put in place in recent years. Those include pre-kindergarten for 4-year-olds and expansion of Medi-Cal, the state’s low-income health care program, to immigrants in the country illegally, which state budget analysts estimated last year would cost $3.1 billion annually.
“Our values are intact despite some tough choices we are making in this budget,” he said.
Permanently locking in place new costs from the boom years is now posing a challenge, said Sun Won Sohn, a professor of economics at Loyola Marymount University.
“The state assumed that good times would continue, especially because the state has a rainy day fund,” he said. “These assumptions turned out to be wrong.”
Also Friday, Newsom proposed $1 billion in cuts to several state housing programs aimed at financing and preserving existing affordable housing.
Among them are the Multifamily Housing program, the Foreclosure Intervention Housing Preservation Program, and the Infill Infrastructure Grant Program. But he said new funding from Proposition 1, a $6.4 billion bond approved by voters in March, is set to increase the number of treatment beds and supportive housing facilities for homeless people.
“There are components of our housing strategy where we are making adjustments, but the core mission remains firm,” Newsom said, adding that the state is committed to “more investment for housing the homeless than ever.”
Educators will be watching the budget negotiations in the Capitol closely. They are particularly concerned about Proposition 98 — the voter-approved, constitutional mandate that guarantees minimum funding for K-12 schools and community colleges.
In January, Newsom proposed lowering the funding requirements to reflect the lower-than-expected state revenues. But because the funding formula builds on prior years to determine how much money to allocate to schools each year, that change could reduce funding for schools by billions of dollars. Educators said they’re prepared to fight.
“It sets a terrible precedent that would destabilize education funding and also violate the voters’ intent when they passed Prop 98,” said Troy Flint, a spokesman for the California School Boards Association. “We are opposed to that decision in the extreme, and we will be fighting against it vigorously.”
Transportation agencies were spared direct cuts in this go-round. Last year, Newsom and state lawmakers agreed to a $1.1 billion bailout of transit agencies, which are running large deficits due to severe drops in ridership as more people work from home. Friday’s budget did not reduce the size of that bailout, but “much of this funding is likely to be delayed,’’ said Rebecca Long, director of legislation and public affairs for the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, adding that the state remains committed to protecting transit services and capital projects.
Overall, Newsom said he understood concerns from various interest groups about cuts and delays in programs, all of which must still be approved by lawmakers. But rather than lay off state workers, impose furloughs or deep cuts in social welfare programs, or raise taxes, he said his approach is the best alternative.
“We have a math problem,” he said. “Is this what I want to do? No.”
A likely candidate for president in 2028, the governor was adamant about not increasing taxes on corporations or the wealthy, something that liberals in the Legislature and some advocacy groups have urged him to do.
He emphasized that despite the current deficit, California still has the fifth-largest economy in the world and just set records for tourism spending and continues to lead in fields from artificial intelligence to computers to immunology.
“People visit from around the world and say, ‘What is it about this state where you continue to punch above your weight, continue to invent the future,’ ” Newsom said.
Staff writer Kristin Bender contributed to this story.
View more on Silicon Valley